Final UI

What analysts actually use.

Beyond the method: information architecture, the upload-to-commit journey, and the six screens where human and model hand work back and forth.

Information architecture

Three roles. One gate before legacy.

Analyst extracts and reviews. Lead watches the pipeline. Compliance exports the trail. Every path still stops at human approval before data touches the old database.

Aura home Live pipeline Document analysis + copilot ESG report Field-level approval Immutable decision log
Analyst journey

Upload to commit.

01 Upload

Client pack lands. PDFs indexed in private cloud only.

02 Extract

RAG pulls Scope 2, factors, citations, confidence.

03 Review

Sarah opens the page-level source beside the number.

04 Decide

Approve or flag at field level. Named, timestamped.

05 Commit

API overlay writes approved fields. Legacy stays intact.

06 Export

Julian pulls the log for GDPR and CSRD review.

Screens

Oversight, analysis, report, gate, trail.

Thomas's pipeline

aura.mmc · live audit pipeline
1.4hAvg cycle
12In review
8%AI override
4.8Trust score
MMC-EU-4471Ready for approval
MMC-EU-4488Low confidence, 67%
MMC-EU-4492Extracting

Sarah's analysis + copilot

aura.mmc · document analysis
Scope 2847 tCO₂e/yr
SourceBill_Q3_2024.pdf, p.7
Vs sector14.3% above benchmark
AURA COPILOT
Scope 2 identified from the Q3 utility bill. Citation pinned. Confidence 94%.
Approve field · Flag field

Approval gate and decision log

Every field is its own decision. Julian's log stores who approved, what source was cited, and whether the model was overridden. That is the product Legal would actually defend.

aura.mmc · immutable log
14:22 · Sarah M.Approved Scope 2 · 94%
14:24 · Sarah M.Flagged factor table v3
14:31 · Thomas K.Released case MMC-EU-4471